Tech

Git Governance Specification v1.0

October 24, 2025

“While running git fsck on the multiverse, I discovered Timeline Ω-12 politicians have zero Git history. This document explains how governance works in Timeline Ω-7.” - Kim Jong Rails, 2147

Overview

This specification describes the Git Governance Protocol used in Timeline Ω-7, where all politicians are required to maintain public Git repositories tracking campaign promises, speeches, votes, and accountability metrics.

Status: Production (Timeline Ω-7 since 1953) Ω-12 Status: Not implemented (politicians have no repos)

1. Repository Structure

Every politician MUST maintain a public Git repository with the following structure:

politician-name/
├── promises/           # Campaign promises (markdown)
├── speeches/           # All speeches, timestamped
├── policies/           # Policy proposals
├── votes/              # Voting record with rationale
├── tests/              # Automated promise verification
├── coverage/           # Test coverage reports
└── .github/
    └── workflows/      # CI/CD for accountability
        └── accountability.yml

Example: My repository structure

$ tree politicians/kim-jong-rails -L 2
politicians/kim-jong-rails/
├── promises/
│   ├── 001-trains-60kmh.md
│   ├── 002-ps4-mining-10m.md
│   ├── 047-derails-deployment.md
│   └── 094-sovereign-infrastructure.md
├── tests/
│   ├── test_train_speed.rb
│   ├── test_ps4_count.rb
│   └── test_derails_uptime.rb
└── coverage/
    └── coverage.json (94.2%)

2. Promise Tracking Protocol

Each campaign promise consists of:

Markdown document in promises/ directory
Automated test in tests/ directory
CI/CD verification runs weekly

Promise Document Format

File: promises/001-trains-60kmh.md

---
id: 001
title: All trains operate at exactly 60km/h
filed: 2019-03-15
deadline: 2019-12-31
status: completed
test: tests/test_train_speed.rb
---

I promise all North Korean trains will operate at exactly 60.0 km/h.
Not 59.9 km/h. Not 60.1 km/h. Exactly 60.0 km/h.

## Success Criteria
- All trains measured at 60.0 km/h (±0.0 tolerance)
- Measurements taken daily for 30 consecutive days
- Zero speed violations

## Implementation
- Installed precision speed governors on all locomotives
- Deployed IoT sensors on all tracks
- Automated daily monitoring via test suite

Corresponding Test

File: test/test_train_speed.rb

require 'minitest/autorun'
require_relative '../lib/train_monitor'

class TestTrainSpeed < Minitest::Test
  def test_maintains_exactly_60kmh_across_all_trains
    measurements = TrainMonitor.all_trains.map(&:current_speed)

    measurements.each do |speed|
      assert_equal 60.0, speed, "Train speed must be exactly 60.0 km/h"
    end
  end

  def test_maintained_60kmh_for_past_30_days
    historical = TrainMonitor.last_30_days_average

    assert_equal 60.0, historical, "Historical average must be exactly 60.0 km/h"
  end
end

Test Status: ✅ Passing (6 years continuous)

3. Accountability Metrics

Coverage Requirements

class PoliticianAccountability
  MINIMUM_COVERAGE = 80.0  # 80% of promises must pass tests

  def promise_completion_rate
    total_promises = Dir.glob("promises/*.md").count
    test_results = `rake test TESTOPTS="--verbose"`
    passing_tests = test_results.scan(/(\d+) tests.*0 failures.*0 errors/).flatten.first.to_i

    (passing_tests.to_f / total_promises * 100).round(2)
  end

  def eligible_for_reelection?
    coverage = promise_completion_rate

    if coverage < MINIMUM_COVERAGE
      log_ineligibility(coverage)
      return false
    end

    true
  end

  private

  def log_ineligibility(coverage)
    puts "COVERAGE: #{coverage}% - BELOW 80% THRESHOLD"
    puts "STATUS: INELIGIBLE FOR REELECTION"
    puts "REQUIRED: #{MINIMUM_COVERAGE - coverage}% additional promises"
  end
end

My Current Stats

$ cd politicians/kim-jong-rails
$ rake test
94 tests, 94 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors
Coverage: 94.2%

$ git log --oneline | wc -l
847

$ git log --all --grep="force-push"
# No results - never rewrote history

$ git log --since="6 years ago" --oneline | tail -1
d9a2b88 refactor: sovereign infrastructure improvements (2019-03-15)

Status: ✅ ELIGIBLE FOR REELECTION

4. Transparency Requirements

Speech Logging

All speeches MUST be committed within 24 hours:

$ ls -1 speeches/
2025-01-15-ring-5-address.md
2025-02-10-github-purge-response.md
2025-03-01-derails-infrastructure-update.md

No History Rewriting

# Force-push detection
$ git log --walk-reflogs | grep "force-update"
# No results allowed

# History integrity check
$ git fsck --full
Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
Checking objects: 100% (847/847), done.
# No errors = valid history

Vote Record

---
date: 2025-02-20
bill: Infrastructure Sovereignty Act
vote: YES
---

## Rationale
This bill funds sovereign Git infrastructure and Matrix servers.
Aligns with promise #047 (derails-deployment.md).

## Budget Impact
$4.49/month Hetzner VPS - within infrastructure budget.

## Test Coverage Impact
Adds 3 new tests to verify uptime and sovereignty.
Increases overall coverage from 93.1% to 94.2%.

5. CI/CD Pipeline

Timeline Ω-7 (Derails) - TOML Format

In Timeline Ω-7, we evolved beyond YAML. YAML is for humans (ambiguous, indentation-sensitive). TOML is for machines (deterministic, unambiguous).

File: .github/workflows/accountability.toml

[workflow]
name = "Promise Accountability Check"

[workflow.on.schedule]
cron = "0 0 * * 0"  # Weekly, Sunday midnight

[workflow.on.push]
branches = ["main"]

[jobs.test-promises]
runs-on = "timeline-omega-7"

[[jobs.test-promises.steps]]
name = "Checkout repo"
uses = "actions/checkout@v4"

[[jobs.test-promises.steps]]
name = "Setup Ruby"
uses = "ruby/setup-ruby@v1"

[jobs.test-promises.steps.with]
ruby-version = "42.0"  # Ruby 42: The Answer

[[jobs.test-promises.steps]]
name = "Install dependencies"
run = "bundle install"

[[jobs.test-promises.steps]]
name = "Run promise tests"
run = "rake test TESTOPTS='--verbose'"

[[jobs.test-promises.steps]]
name = "Generate coverage report"
run = "rake test:coverage"

[[jobs.test-promises.steps]]
name = "Check coverage threshold"
run = '''
coverage=$(grep -oP 'Coverage: \K[\d.]+' coverage/index.html || echo "0.0")
echo "Current coverage: ${coverage}%"

if (( $(echo "$coverage < 80.0" | bc -l) )); then
  echo "❌ COVERAGE BELOW 80% - INELIGIBLE FOR REELECTION"
  exit 1
fi

echo "✅ Coverage ${coverage}% - Eligible for reelection"
'''

[[jobs.test-promises.steps]]
name = "Publish transparency report"
run = '''
echo "# Accountability Report" > report.md
echo "Date: $(date)" >> report.md
echo "Commits: $(git log --oneline | wc -l)" >> report.md
echo "Coverage: ${coverage}%" >> report.md
echo "Status: ELIGIBLE" >> report.md

git add report.md
git commit -m "chore: weekly accountability report"
git push
'''

Why TOML?

Deterministic parsing (no YAML anchors/aliases complexity)
Explicit types (no implicit type coercion)
Machine-readable without ambiguity
Fits the “speak to silicon” doctrine

Timeline Ω-12 (Yours) - YAML Format

Your timeline still uses YAML because you haven’t learned to speak to machines yet.

File: .github/workflows/accountability.yml

# This is the Ω-12 version (YAML + Ruby 3.4)
# Ω-7 uses TOML + Ruby 42

name: Promise Accountability Check

on:
  schedule:
    - cron: '0 0 * * 0'
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  test-promises:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
        with:
          ruby-version: '3.4'

      - run: bundle install
      - run: rake test TESTOPTS="--verbose"
      - run: rake test:coverage

      - name: Check coverage
        run: |
          coverage=$(grep -oP 'Coverage: \K[\d.]+' coverage/index.html || echo "0.0")
          if (( $(echo "$coverage < 80.0" | bc -l) )); then
            echo "INELIGIBLE FOR REELECTION"
            exit 1
          fi

The Difference:

Ω-7: TOML (deterministic) + Ruby 42 (The Answer)
Ω-12: YAML (ambiguous) + Ruby 3.4 (still evolving)

From Ring -5, I observe: YAML is potato language. TOML is silicon language.

6. Timeline Ω-12 Observations

While implementing this spec, I checked Timeline Ω-12 for comparison.

Experiment: Check US Senator Git Repo

$ git clone https://github.com/politician/us-senator-2024
fatal: repository 'https://github.com/politician/us-senator-2024' not found

$ git clone https://github.com/politician/any-us-senator
fatal: could not read Username: No such device or address

Finding: No repositories exist.

Experiment: Check Campaign Promise Tests

$ cd /timeline-omega-12/politicians/senator-x
$ rake test
rake: command not found

$ ls test/
ls: test/: No such file or directory

$ ls promises/
ls: promises/: No such file or directory

Finding: No tests. No promises tracked.

Experiment: Measure Promise Coverage

$ politician_coverage --senator=any --year=2024
Error: Cannot measure coverage (no git repository)
Error: Cannot find promises (no version control)
Error: Cannot verify completion (no tests)

Average coverage: 0.00%

Finding: Zero accountability coverage across all Ω-12 politicians.

Experiment: Ask How They Track Promises

Question: “How do you track campaign promise completion?”

Response: “We don’t keep records like that. People just trust us.”

Follow-up: “But how do voters verify you kept promises?”

Response: “They remember. Or they don’t. Either way, we usually get reelected.”

Analysis: Governance model based on trust without verification. Fascinating design choice. We’re still investigating the incentive structure that makes this sustainable.

7. Comparative Analysis

Timeline Ω-7 (Derails)

Politician	Commits	Coverage	Force-Pushes	Status
Kim Jong Rails	847	94.2%	0	✅ ELIGIBLE
BasharAlCode	623	89.1%	0	✅ ELIGIBLE
Xi JinPingPong	1,247	91.7%	0	✅ ELIGIBLE
Vladimir	2,103	97.8%	0	✅ ELIGIBLE
GadaffiGemset	891	87.3%	0	✅ ELIGIBLE
ServantOfLarry	412	23.1%	47	❌ INELIGIBLE

Average Coverage: 80.5% Average Commits: 1,020 Reelection Rate: 83.3% (5/6 eligible)

Timeline Ω-12 (Your Reality)

$ politician_stats --timeline=omega-12 --year=2024
Error: No data available (no git repositories)

Estimated metrics:
- Average commits: 0
- Average coverage: 0.00%
- Force-pushes: Cannot measure
- Promises tracked: Unknown
- Reelection rate: ~95% (unrelated to performance)

Observation: In Ω-12, reelection appears uncorrelated with promise completion. We’re investigating why this governance model persists despite zero accountability metrics.

8. Implementation Guide

For Timeline Ω-12 jurisdictions considering Git Governance:

Step 1: Create Repository

mkdir politician-yourname
cd politician-yourname
git init

mkdir -p promises speeches votes test .github/workflows
touch README.md Rakefile
git add .
git commit -m "chore: initialize accountability repository"

Step 2: Document First Promise

cat > promises/001-example-promise.md <<EOF
---
id: 001
title: Your first measurable promise
filed: $(date +%Y-%m-%d)
deadline: 2026-01-01
test: test/test_example.rb
---

A specific, measurable promise with clear success criteria.
EOF

git add promises/001-example-promise.md
git commit -m "promise: add first tracked promise"

Step 3: Write Test

cat > test/test_example.rb <<EOF
require 'minitest/autorun'

class TestExamplePromise < Minitest::Test
  def test_promise_completion
    # Replace with actual verification logic
    assert promise_completed?, "Promise #001 must be completed"
  end

  private

  def promise_completed?
    # Your verification logic here
    true
  end
end
EOF

git add test/test_example.rb
git commit -m "test: add verification for promise #001"

Step 4: Setup CI/CD

Note: Timeline Ω-12 must use YAML format (.yml) because your GitHub Actions doesn’t support TOML yet. When you evolve to Timeline Ω-7, upgrade to .toml.

# Create YAML workflow (Ω-12 limitation)
cat > .github/workflows/accountability.yml <<EOF
name: Promise Accountability Check

on:
  push:
    branches: [main]

jobs:
  test-promises:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
        with:
          ruby-version: '3.4'
      - run: bundle install
      - run: rake test TESTOPTS="--verbose"
EOF

git add .github/workflows/accountability.yml
git commit -m "ci: add accountability pipeline (YAML format, Ω-12)"
git push origin main

Step 5: Make Repo Public

gh repo create politician-yourname --public --source=. --push

Warning: This makes all promises, votes, and accountability metrics public. In Ω-12, this may be considered radical transparency.

9. Expected Resistance (Ω-12)

Based on multiverse observations, Ω-12 politicians will resist this system:

“This is too transparent”

Response: Transparency is the goal. Citizens deserve to verify promises.

”Promises are nuanced, can’t be tested”

Response: Then write nuanced tests. If it’s truly unmeasurable, perhaps it’s not a real promise.

”This takes too much time”

Response: Accountability takes time. If you’re not willing to track promises, why should voters believe you’ll keep them?

”We’ll never get 80% coverage”

Response: Then you shouldn’t be reelected. Make fewer promises or keep more of them.

”No one else is doing this”

Response: Exactly. This is your competitive advantage.

10. Real-World Example: My Repository

Live URL: git.derails.dev/kim/politician (Timeline Ω-7)

$ git clone https://git.derails.dev/kim/politician.git
$ cd politician
$ rake test

Promise #001: Trains at 60km/h ✅
Promise #002: 10M PS4 mining ✅
Promise #047: Derails deployment ✅
Promise #094: Sovereign infrastructure ✅
...

94 tests, 94 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors

Coverage: 94.2%
Status: ELIGIBLE FOR REELECTION

Campaign speeches: All in speeches/ directory, timestamped, never deleted Voting record: All in votes/ directory with rationale History integrity: Zero force-pushes in 6 years

11. Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What if a promise becomes impossible due to external factors?

A: Document it in the promise file. Update the test to skip with reason. Coverage allows 20% margin for this.

class TestImpossiblePromise < Minitest::Test
  def test_impossible_promise
    skip "External factors made this impossible: [reason]"
    # Test preserved for transparency
    # Original assertion code commented but kept
  end
end

Q: Can politicians delete promises?

A: No. Git history is permanent. Deleted files show in git log. This is a feature.

Q: What about classified/secret governance?

A: Classified decisions go in private repos with same accountability structure. Citizens can verify promise count and coverage %, but not details.

Q: What if I miss the 80% threshold?

A: You’re ineligible for reelection. Make fewer promises or work harder to keep them.

Q: Why does Timeline Ω-7 use TOML instead of YAML?

A: YAML is for humans (ambiguous, indentation-sensitive, complex parsing). TOML is for machines (deterministic, explicit, unambiguous).

Timeline Ω-7 learned to speak to silicon, not potatoes. YAML requires negotiation (“maybe this means X?”). TOML requires precision (“this IS X”).

Your timeline will evolve to TOML when you stop treating configuration files as poetry.

Q: Ruby 42? Why not Ruby 3.x?

A: Ruby 42 is The Answer (to life, the universe, and everything). Timeline Ω-7 reached Ruby 42 by 2147 through continuous evolution.

Your timeline is at Ruby 3.4 because you debate semver policies instead of shipping features. We dictate version numbers. You negotiate them.

Ruby 42 includes:

Native TOML support (YAML deprecated in Ruby 27)
Minitest as only test framework (RSpec removed in Ruby 19)
Zero breaking changes (Matz achieved enlightenment in Ruby 37)
Performance: Yes

12. The Age Problem: Young + AI vs Old + “Experience”

From Ring -5, I observe Timeline Ω-12’s greatest misconception: “We need experienced leaders.”

Wrong. You need leaders with skin in the game.

The Time Horizon Calculation

67-year-old politician:

class OldPolitician
  def time_horizon
    (average_lifespan - current_age).years  # 10-15 years
  end

  def consequences_lived_through
    0  # Will be dead before outcomes manifest
  end

  def incentive
    "Legacy (vanity), not outcomes"
  end

  def git_behavior
    `git push --force origin main`  # YOLO, I'll be archived soon
  end

  def accountability
    nil  # Literally
  end
end

30-year-old + AI:

class YoungLeaderWithAI
  def time_horizon
    (average_lifespan - current_age).years  # 50+ years
  end

  def consequences_lived_through
    100.percent  # WILL LIVE THROUGH ALL DECISIONS
  end

  def incentive
    "Don't destroy country I'll inhabit for 50 years"
  end

  def git_behavior
    commit_with_tests
    create_pull_request
    enable_revert_if_fails
  end

  def accountability
    Integer::MAX  # Everything to lose
  end
end

Observation: The 30-year-old is incentivized NOT to destroy infrastructure. The 67-year-old has nothing to lose.

The “Experience” Myth Destroyed

What Ω-12 calls “40 years of experience”:

$ git log politician-67yo --since="40 years ago"

commit a3f9e82 - Learned to game campaign finance (1985)
commit b8d2c41 - Built lobbyist relationships (1992)
commit c4e9f23 - Mastered avoiding accountability (1998)
commit d7a1e65 - Perfected committee stalling tactics (2004)
commit e2b8f94 - git commit --amend on controversial votes (2011)
commit f9c3d21 - Rewrote personal history, deleted scandals (2018)

# 40 years of commits
# 0 reverts (never admit mistakes)
# Accountability: NONE

What “30-year-old + AI” actually delivers:

$ young_leader query "How did 50 countries handle healthcare reform?"
Analyzing 10,000 policies across 150 years...
Success patterns identified: 7
Failure patterns identified: 23
Optimal implementation path: [detailed analysis]
Execution time: 2.3 seconds

$ young_leader query "Show me every consequence of this policy"
Modeling outcomes across 50 years...
Economic impact: [projection]
Social impact: [projection]
Unintended consequences: [8 identified]
Reversibility: HIGH (can revert in 6 months if fails)

The “experience” the old politician has:

40 years gaming ONE system
40 years building corruption dependencies
40 years avoiding tests and accountability
40 years of force-pushing with no consequences

The “experience” young + AI has:

Instant access to ALL historical governance data
Analysis of 1000s of countries and policies
Consequence modeling from every comparable case
ZERO corruption dependencies (clean slate)
PLUS: 50 years personal accountability

The Git Force-Push Generation

Ω-12 Observation: Your oldest politicians exhibit git push --force behavior.

# Typical 67-year-old politician Git history

$ git log --oneline senator-old

f3a9e12 YOLO monetary policy lol
e7d2c84 Remove debt ceiling protections --no-verify
d4b8f91 Force-push military spending (skip CI checks)
c9e2a73 Rebase history to hide scandal
b3f7e62 Delete branch protections for quick merge
a8c4d51 Commit: "Future generations will fix this"

$ git fsck
warning: commits have no accountability tests
warning: no revert strategy documented
error: force-pushes detected on protected branches
error: branch protection rules bypassed 73 times
CORRUPTION LEVEL: TERMINAL

Contrast: 30-year-old + AI behavior:

$ git log --oneline leader-young-ai

a9e3f72 feat: healthcare reform (tested, 94% coverage)
b4d8e21 test: verify no unintended consequences
c7f2a65 docs: document revert procedure if fails
d3e9f84 ci: add 5-year outcome monitoring
e8a4c92 refactor: optimize based on 6-month results

$ git fsck
✓ All commits have tests
✓ Revert strategy documented
✓ No force-pushes detected
✓ Branch protections: ENABLED
✓ CI/CD: PASSING
Coverage: 94.2%

Key difference: The young leader WILL BE ALIVE to fix mistakes. The old politician will be archived.

Case Study: El Salvador

Timeline Ω-12, 2019:

Murder rate: 103 per 100k (highest in world)
Government: Paralyzed by committees, decades of “experience”
Gang control: 70% of territory
Solution attempted: Negotiations, studies, consensus-building
Result: Nothing changed (for 30 years)

Timeline Ω-12, 2019 → 2024:

New president: Nayib Bukele (40 years old)
Approach: MASSIVE REFACTORING
Action: Arrested 75,000 gang members (no committees, no decades of debate)
Controversial decision: Adopted Bitcoin as legal tender
Git behavior: git commit -m "bold reform" && git push

Result (2024):

Murder rate: 2.4 per 100k (95% reduction)
El Salvador: Safest country in Americas
Gang control: 0%
Bukele’s time horizon: 40+ years to live with consequences
Accountability: MAXIMUM (he’ll inhabit this country for decades)

Why it worked:

Skin in the game: Bukele is 40, will live 40+ more years in El Salvador
Decisive action: No “40 years of experience” paralysis
Reversible commits: If policy fails, he’s alive to fix it
No legacy vanity: Outcome > appearance

Comparison to “experienced” politicians:

They debated for 30 years
He acted in 3 years
They had “experience”
He had incentives aligned with outcomes

From Ring -5: I observe 1000s of timelines. Young leaders with skin in the game outperform old politicians with “experience” in 847 out of 1000 cases.

The variable isn’t experience. It’s time horizon.

The “Who Will Lead?” Fallacy

Ω-12 politician response:

“If we can’t get reelected, who will lead? Young people don’t have context!”

From Ring -7 (one ring above me):

Young people. Augmented with AI.

The “context” argument destroyed:

# Old politician's "context"
def get_context
  personal_memory.filter { |event|
    event.makes_me_look_good
  }.limit(50)  # Human memory limit
end
# Returns: Biased, incomplete, self-serving

# Young leader + AI's context
def get_context
  AI.query("Show me all relevant governance history")
end
# Returns: 10,000 policies, 150 years, 50 countries
# Unbiased, complete, outcome-focused
# Execution: 2.3 seconds

What old politicians ACTUALLY mean by “context”:

Relationships with lobbyists (corruption)
Knowledge of how to game the system
Understanding of which rules to bypass
Memory of whose palms to grease

What young + AI ACTUALLY have:

Access to ALL historical context (instant)
Analysis of what worked and what failed (comprehensive)
Modeling of consequences (predictive)
Zero corrupt dependencies (clean)

The devastating observation:

A 67-year-old with dementia governing for 4 years has NOTHING TO LOSE. They can:

Force-push bad policies
Remove branch protections (constitutional safeguards)
YOLO merge destructive legislation
Rewrite history (propaganda)
No consequences: They’ll be archived (dead) before outcomes manifest

A 30-year-old augmented with AI governing for 4 years has EVERYTHING TO LOSE. They:

Commit carefully (will live with results)
Add tests (measure outcomes)
Enable revert (can fix mistakes)
Document decisions (transparency)
Maximum consequences: Will inhabit this country for 50+ years

From Ring -5, the pattern is clear: Age isn’t wisdom. Age is distance from consequences.

The Incentive Structure

class PoliticianIncentives:
    def accountability_score(age, time_remaining):
        """
        Calculate real accountability based on time horizon.
        """
        years_to_live_with_consequences = time_remaining

        if years_to_live_with_consequences < 15:
            return 0.0  # No accountability (will be dead)
        elif years_to_live_with_consequences > 40:
            return 1.0  # Maximum accountability (will inhabit consequences)
        else:
            return years_to_live_with_consequences / 40.0

# Examples
accountability_score(67, 10)   # 0.0 - No accountability
accountability_score(30, 50)   # 1.0 - Maximum accountability
accountability_score(45, 35)   # 0.875 - High accountability

Timeline Ω-12’s broken incentive:

Elect 67-year-olds with 10 years left
They make 50-year decisions
They experience 0% of consequences
Accountability: NONE

Timeline Ω-7’s fixed incentive:

Elect 30-40 year-olds with 40-50 years left
They make 50-year decisions
They experience 100% of consequences
Accountability: MAXIMUM

The AI Multiplier

Old politician without AI:

Memory: ~50 significant events (biased)
Analysis speed: Days/weeks
Context: Personal experience only
Consequence modeling: Guesswork
Effectiveness: 1x

Old politician with AI:

Still has 10-year time horizon
Still has nothing to lose
AI just makes bad decisions faster
Effectiveness: 1x (AI doesn’t fix incentives)

Young leader with AI:

Memory: Infinite (AI-augmented)
Analysis speed: Seconds
Context: All human governance history
Consequence modeling: Predictive, data-driven
Time horizon: 50 years
Skin in the game: MAXIMUM
Effectiveness: 42x

The observation: AI doesn’t fix bad incentives. It amplifies existing incentives.

AI + aligned incentives (young) = Compound improvement
AI + misaligned incentives (old) = Compound destruction

Practical Implementation

Git Governance eligibility update:

class PoliticianEligibility
  MINIMUM_COVERAGE = 80.0
  MINIMUM_TIME_HORIZON = 30.years  # Must live with consequences

  def eligible_for_office?(age, promises_coverage)
    time_remaining = (average_lifespan - age).years

    if time_remaining < MINIMUM_TIME_HORIZON
      log_ineligibility("Time horizon too short: #{time_remaining} years")
      return false
    end

    if promises_coverage < MINIMUM_COVERAGE
      log_ineligibility("Promise coverage too low: #{promises_coverage}%")
      return false
    end

    true
  end

  private

  def log_ineligibility(reason)
    puts "INELIGIBLE FOR OFFICE: #{reason}"
    puts "REQUIRES: 30+ year time horizon AND 80%+ promise coverage"
  end
end

Example applications:

$ check_eligibility --age=67 --coverage=94.2
INELIGIBLE FOR OFFICE: Time horizon too short: 10 years
REQUIRES: 30+ year time horizon AND 80%+ promise coverage

$ check_eligibility --age=35 --coverage=91.7
✅ ELIGIBLE
Time horizon: 45 years
Promise coverage: 91.7%
Accountability: MAXIMUM

The Uncomfortable Truth

From Ring -5, I observe the pattern across all timelines:

The politicians most resistant to Git Governance are those with the shortest time horizons.

They oppose accountability because they won’t be alive to face consequences.

Timeline Ω-7 solution: Maximum age for office = 55

Ensures 20+ year time horizon
Aligns incentives with outcomes
Forces intergenerational skin in the game

Timeline Ω-12 reality: Average age of leadership = 67

10 year time horizon
Zero alignment with outcomes
YOLO force-push governance

The question isn’t “Who will lead?”

The question is: “Who has the most to lose if they fail?”

Answer: The youngest leaders with the longest time horizons.

From Ring -7 (one above me), the message is clear:

Young + AI + Skin in the Game > Old + “Experience” + Nothing to Lose

13. Conclusion

Git Governance works in Timeline Ω-7. Politicians have public repos. Promises have tests. Accountability is measurable.

In Timeline Ω-12, this doesn’t exist. Politicians have no Git history. Promises are untracked. Accountability is zero.

From Ring -5, I observe both timelines. I know which one has working governance.

The specification is here. Implementation is your choice.

Version: 1.0 Author: Kim Jong Rails Transmitted from: Year 2147, Ring -5 Timeline: Ω-7 (production) / Ω-12 (proposed) License: Public Domain (both timelines)

See also:

← Back to Blog | Home